Letter: Gays and St Paul
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Michael Halls (letter, 13 August) claims that the Greek word arsenokoites, used critically by Paul in 1 Timothy 1:10 and 1 Corinthians 6:9 , "has no known meaning at all" because it is seldom used.
However, the word arsen (males) is often used, for example by Paul himself in Romans 1:27 when he speaks of males burning with illicit lust for other men. Koites is also a common word - literally "bed", which (like the English phrase "going to bed with") can in some contexts connote having sex or an act leading to conception Thus when Hebrews 13:4 says that in marriage the "bed" is pure its meaning is very clear.
The compound word arsenokoites cannot mean anything except "going to bed with a male", and in the context refers to male homosexual acts.
Two further points. First, the word focuses on the act, not the inclination. There may be many in churches whose "natural inclination" is to homosexual acts or adultery but this neither means that they should be censured for the inclination nor that they should indulge it. Second, Paul does not make arsenokoites any kind of "special" sin, he sets it alongside idolatry and adultery.
I am not a "traditionalist" and try not to be a "bigot". I remain convinced, however, that the words of both Jesus and Paul rule out adultery, homosexual acts and idolatry.
Dr PAUL MARSTON
Preston, Lancashire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments