Letter: Flexible grammar
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I can - or should, must - not be surprised at the reported decline in the use of modal verbs and their replacement by Americanisms such as "gotta" and "gonna". It is somehow very difficult to see the exact meaning of a modal.
To take an example: "I should tell my parents first." Does should indicate obligation or advisability? Hard to tell. A teenager would be on much safer parental ground with "have got to". The use of may can express possibility or permission. Should someone use would when they mean will?
The vast majority of people are not grammarians and don't speak like characters in a classic novel. They want to express clearly and succinctly - albeit ungrammatically - their intentions. "Gotta" and "gonna" have the advantage of being direct and unambiguous. After all, might is not always right.
JOHN O'BYRNE
Dublin
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments