Letter: Female roles
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: To describe the term "actress" as "time-honoured" (letter, 17 March) seems odd.
There was certainly nothing honourable about the term at the end of the 17th century. Women had only recently won the legal right to appear on the stage, and the male actors previously specialising in female roles who were thus put out of work soon saw to it that the word "actress" should become synonymous with whore, amoral female, rapacious seductress; a tradition continued by some sections of the press to include bimbo, striptease artist and show-girl.
If female actors disdain a word which implies that their job description includes such services it does not seem at all bizarre to me but, rather, long over-due.
MOLLY BARRELL
Ilminster, Somerset
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments