Letter:Fascist GM protests
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Thanks are due to Roy Hattersley (Notebook, 21 August) for saying what a section of the scientific community has felt for some time. Yes, "destroying GM test crops is an essentially Fascist activity" because it has been based on a disregard for truth.
Scientists involved in plant genetic engineering know they are developing a technology which has the potential to improve both the efficiency and environment-friendliness of agriculture. The widespread and largely hysterical opposition to GM crops in this country has left many of us baffled.
The "anti" lobby has mounted a campaign which the scientific community has been unable to match in volume, or in news-grabbing soundbites, despite the efforts of the Royal Society, among others.
Why have the scientists not been more active in rebutting many misleading statements? Good scientists are concerned with truth. There is no evidence that GM crops have damaged the environment or are harmful to human health. However, it is possible to imagine circumstances in which these outcomes could be produced, and therefore a good scientist must recognise these possibilities. Balanced views do not make news.
The anti-GM lobby appears to believe that GM crops are inherently evil, and therefore a balanced view is irrelevant.
Perhaps "Fascist"is rather too strong a term for what is more like irresponsibility, or even silliness. One of my elderly relatives always maintained that the weather had got worse since "all these astronauts started whizzing about up in the sky". The fuss about GM crops has certain similarities to this attitude - with the big difference that very few people seem to be able to see the funny side.
JOHN A GATEHOUSE
Department of Biological Sciences
University of Durham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments