Letter: Falklands' future
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I cordially disagree with the letters from Sir Rex Hunt and Dominic Kirkham ("Falklands claims", 22 March) and Jan Cheeks (24 March).
Sir Rex suggests that the Argentine claim is weakened by the fact that the islands are 200 miles away from the mainland. What, then, could one say about Britain's own claim, when they are more than 6,500 miles away from London?
Implications that Argentina has acquiesced in the colonial occupation are well off the mark. Since the first day in 1833, my country has unfailingly protested and contested such a situation.
Furthermore, it must be stressed that the International Court of Justice as early as 1975 recognised that the right to self-determination cannot be construed as enjoying absolute priority in relation to other principles of international law (ICJ, advisory opinion, 16 October 1975). As the British judge of the court, Dame Rosalyn Higgins, wrote: "Attractive an aphorism though [self-determination] is, it still has to be said that the territorial issue does come first. Until it is determined where territorial sovereignty lies, it is impossible to see if the inhabitants have a right to self- determination" (Dame Rosalyn Higgins, Problems and Process - International Law and How We Use It, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994).
All this is fully in line with the UN doctrine and practice on decolonisation and its many specific resolutions on the South Atlantic problem.
In fact on 27 November 1985 the UN expressly rejected two proposals to apply the principle of self-determination to the "Falkland/Malvinas question".
Be it as it may, it is clear that it is in the best interest of everyone that this issue be resolved through direct amicable negotiations between Argentina and Britain. To this, Argentina is firmly committed.
ROGELIO PFIRTER
Ambassador
Embassy of the Argentine Republic
London W1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments