Letter: `Failed' at 11
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: There should not be once-and-for-all selection at age 11: but Reg Hansell's suggestion that the top 25 per cent on the day should be held back to spare the feelings of the "non-selected" 75 per cent is absurd. However, such selection is wrong because it is unreliable in the borderlands between pass and fail at that age.
Far from children in comprehensive primary schools being "happy", many are made miserable by being held back by the needs of the majority. Streaming by level of function should apply throughout schooling, and should take place on arrival in any school at any age, and be reviewed at least annually thereafter. Get rid of the obsession with age - put children with those who learn at similar speed, and in secondary schools stream by subject performance after the first year.
Children should be offered emotional and social support appropriate for their age: education appropriate to their intellectual needs.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments