Letter: European? Not us
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Earl Russell (letter, 16 June) says that the control of economic policy by a sovereign nation state such as Britain is something that events such as the electronic movement of money world-wide have precluded .
Therefore, he implies, we have little to lose by jumping into a mainland continental ship large enough to deflect at least some economic waves. But this "element of political control" of world economic forces, in return for which we are expected to give up autonomy in economic and other matters, is not defined.
It is, in truth, a vague, pious hope, predicated on the belief that the market-wave-defying boat of a politically integrated Europe will be steered benignly in a direction of our choosing.
In fact, Britain has always accommodated itself to the economic forces governing world markets. To be "run" by market forces is, in fact, merely to continue to adapt ourselves to forces with which we have always co- existed, and amid which we thrive.
We will get buffeted occasionally, but this is surely preferable to jumping into a political vessel which will offer limited and temporary protection, and which is more than likely to get its propellors jammed in bureaucratic weeds within a decade or two.
HEON STEPHENSON
Centre for Legal Studies
University of Sussex,
Brighton
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments