Letter: Ethical audit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: At a time when principles of good professional practice all too often seem to come second to commercial considerations, the "Chinese Walls" judgment in the KPMG case (report, 16 September) is very welcome.
That judgment is about people in the same firm acting for opposing parties, and has resonance for professions other than accounting. There is however another, more common and more profound threat to the exercise of independent judgement in accountancy.
Practices engaged as auditors use their position to identify other business services which they can sell to the companies they audit, with the aim of becoming general business advisors. This is done as a matter of policy, and as firms get larger so they are able to offer more services and embrace their clients ever more intimately.
Now, company directors should no doubt be free to buy all their business advice at one stall, if it appears to them, however misguidedly, that that gives the best outcome. However, audit is not business advice; it is a crucial check - with a strong public interest element - upon a company's reporting of its results. Auditors ought to stand as nearly as possible at arm's length from the subjects of their inquiries. Year by year, the commercial orientation of the accountancy sector is making this independence less and less attainable.
If we cannot look to the accountancy profession to secure the necessary degree of independence, the alternative has to be to protect the public interest by regulation from outside the profession. I should be very interested in readers' - and The Independent's - views on the form such regulation might take.
C J HOLLAND
London SE3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments