Letter: English heritage
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Richard Hoggart (Saturday Essay, 5 September) protests too much about our national identity. We may be muddled about whether we are English or British, but our ancestors were muddled about whether they were Angles or Saxons: they settled for the former, but their Celtic neighbours still call us the latter. And those Celts are muddled, too: the "Welsh" were really British; the "Scots" were really Irish, and most Lowlanders were really English.
The claim that "the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he" was indeed made centuries ago - by Thomas Rainborow during the English Revolution - but it still isn't recognised; look at the homeless in our cities or the travellers in our countryside.
No, our main characteristics are that we are relatively safe and relatively rich, which is why most of us are fairly - but not very - nice.
NICOLAS WALTER
London N1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments