Sir: The ruling on behalf of the teenager whose interview was terminated after three minutes because the job involved heavy lifting and she was pregnant, means that employers must develop new, subtle but time-wasting procedures when interviewing ("Pregnant girl wins job payout", 15 December).
It appears to me that the world is a sad, mad place when someone can win compensation on such seemingly illogical grounds.
In the days when I interviewed for staff, the initial considerations were: did the applicant have the personality to fit in with the current team, or were they liable to be a pain in the backside?
If these considerations provided negative vibes, we went through the motions, but did not employ them. Experience teaches us that the person with the best paper qualifications is not always the best person for the job.
My instinct generally served me well but every time I ignored that "little voice", the department and the company always suffered. Political correctness now does not allow the employer to confess to using such instincts, so they will simply find other ways to sensibly reject anyone that they feel is undesirable.
ROY TOPP
Sanderstead, Surrey
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies