Letter: Drugs in sport
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In drawing attention to the widespread use of legal, but potentially harmful, performance-enhancing methods by sportsmen you have highlighted an area that requires wider debate. At present this debate is stifled, as evidenced by the condemnation heaped upon the president of the International Olympic Committee, Juan Samaranch, when he dared to suggest that the distinction between legal and illegal means of performance enhancement was not clear-cut and should be reviewed.
The use of creatine is not the only example of potentially harmful yet legal forms of assisting sporting performance. Many endurance athletes are encouraged to pursue diets which risk osteoporosis and infertility and the risks of long-term colostrum use are unexamined. Neither are we allowed to question the relative safety of currently illegal performance- enhancement methods. For example, might it be safer to complete a 4,000km cycle race in 22 days at an average speed of nearly 40km an hour (as this year's Tour de France competitors were asked to do) with the assistance of carefully monitored erythropoietin administration?
The distinction between what is safe or harmful, natural or a drug, legal or illegal is not as clear-cut as some would like. The result is sport riddled with hypocrisy and athletes at risk.
Dr A CURRIE
Wylam, Northumberland,
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments