Letter: Denver tragedy

Colin Standfield London W7
Thursday 22 April 1999 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Denver tragedy

Sir: If an argument against a written constitution were needed, the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is it. It was designed not to put semi-automatic machine guns into the hands of 18-year-olds but to limit the power of the national government to disarm a state militia, "a well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State".

After 200 years, it can be seen to be badly drafted and it has been even worse construed. But it is "constitutional" and therefore all but immutable. The entire US Constitution reflects only the attitudes and aspirations of its time, and we need to remember that it contained a compromise permitting the slave trade until 1808. Not until 1865 was the trade abolished by the 13th Amendment.

The terrible events in Littleton are just one result of a set of rules practically cast in stone more than two centuries ago. The National Rifle Association will, of course, contest to the utmost a further amendment to limit the carrying of weapons, even though there is nothing in the Constitution to prevent individual states' so doing.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in