Letter: Defence of the Bar

Julian Smith
Wednesday 03 November 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The call by Robert Sayer, President of the Law Society, for the creation of a single profession of lawyers (report, 30 October) will be welcomed by those barristers who see the solicitor as an unnecessary and expensive middleman.

His claims that solicitors provide a better service than barristers come at a time when, rightly or wrongly, the solicitors' profession is vilified for its poor level of service and failure to protect the public from negligent and unscrupulous practitioners; and when, for whatever reason, a majority of the solicitors who sit the exam to gain rights of audience in the higher courts, usually experienced practitioners, fail to pass.

Nor can Mr Sayer claim barristers are an additional cost. There is a division of labour between the solicitor and barrister. Barristers are in fact cheaper litigators than solicitors, while offering specialist legal knowledge and skills in advocacy, which is why solicitors continue to instruct barristers to undertake work they could do themselves.

Mr Sayer's attack on the Bar is not in the public interest or in the interests of the majority of the Law Society's members. At present small and medium-sized high-street firms of solicitors are able to compete effectively with large and expensive specialist litigation firms through their access to the Bar. Long may it last.

JULIAN SMITH

Barrister

London WC2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in