Letter: Debt relief needed

Ann Pettifor
Thursday 19 November 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Diane Coyle is wrong ("Ignore the hysteria over debt", 11 November). High levels of debt are related to Central America's vulnerability to disaster. Hondurans are diverting 80 per cent of government revenues to foreign creditors, revenues that should go to infrastructure, health and sanitation.

The Jubilee 2000 Coalition is not exploiting death and hardship. We are responding to a direct appeal for debt relief from Archbishop Rodriguez and other leading Hondurans. If the Rio Chico had not burst its banks, I would have been in Tegucigalpa for the launch of the Latin America-wide Jubilee 2000 campaign. Ms Coyle argues that Nicaragua and Honduras have received more "flows" from the West than they have paid in interest. "Flows" is standard IMF jargon for new lending and grant aid. Ms Coyle compares this to a salary coming in and a mortgage going out. But a salary is income, not borrowing. Taking new loans to pay off old loans, when your house has blown down, is reckless. If you lose your job, taking new loans would be calamitous. But this is standard IMF advice to poor, effectively bankrupt countries, which rely on income from single commodities to repay debts. For the last decade, egged on by Western leaders, they have poured new, cheaper loans into indebted countries. This has made matters worse.

Ms Coyle is clearly unaware of the miserly relief offered by the New World Bank/IMF plan (HIPC). If Honduras and Nicaragua get the same deal as agreed recently for post-conflict Mozambique, then they will remain in debt bondage for some time.

But Ms Coyle is right about one thing: we need further informed debate. That is why 40 countries are sending delegates to an international Jubilee 2000 conference on debt in Rome this week. The debate will centre on the speed, depth and terms of debt relief. But in contrast to Western debates, these debates will be led by Mozambicans, Hondurans and Nicaraguans.

ANN PETTIFOR

Director Jubilee 2000 Coalition

London SE1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in