Letter: Community care
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Community care
Sir: "Care in the community is thrown out" was your headline (30 July) reporting that Frank Dobson, Secretary of State for Health admitted that: "Care in the community has failed. Discharging people from institutions has brought benefits to some..."
In publicising this failure in well-intentioned public policy, no mention was made of the equally sad case of the care in the community policy for people who suffer from permanent mental handicap/learning disability. Some of these people have also benefited but there are others whose lives have become more restricted in their daily activities.
For these people to return to barrack-like institutions would be retrograde. However, many hospitals for people with mental handicap were built as open campuses in pleasant surroundings convenient to towns. To utilise such suitable sites for homes in open village clusters, with medical, therapeutic and day facilities within walking or wheelchair distance would provide a choice of lifestyle that is currently not available on anything like the scale that is desired. Long term this would be a better policy decision than the short- term gain that comes from selling the assets for development as luxury housing.
There is good evidence that many parents and relatives, and those people with a mental handicap able to understand, desire access to village-style residential communities. A significant number who are already living in the community would prefer life in the larger social grouping of a village community. Such an option would be care-effective and cost-effective.
MURIEL BROOK
Dorking, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments