Letter: Children and MMR
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir, Your well-meaning leading article on measles, mumps and rubella vaccine is a piece of great foolishness. You say that it is a scandal that the Government will not let people have the three components separately, and that the NHS must allow patients' wishes to be respected.
As a paediatrician, I have respected parents' wishes scrupulously in matters concerning immunisation for the past 15 years. The last vaccine scare was about whooping cough. I have spent many hours putting the evidence one way and the other to parents about that vaccine, explaining my view of the balance of risk, and justifying it with evidence. I then recommend in favour of immunisation but respect parents' wishes not to be bullied into giving it, if they cannot bring themselves to, after my explanation.
MMR given in separate components is different. There is no evidence at all that it is safer, only feelings like your "not unreasonable view". Here, I am the one who is being bullied into giving something that I think is wrong. If parents had the right to refuse whooping cough vaccine when they felt is was wrong, I have the right to refuse to give something for which there is no evidence of benefit, and some evidence of harm.
As you say, we are rightly moving away from professionals dictating to consumers. We are also moving towards professionals having to justify with evidence, everything they do. That means that the NHS cannot be considered like your local supermarket where the consumer can dictate to the professional.
FRANCIS SHEEHY SKEFFINGTON
Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments