Letter: Celestial spheres
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: John Gribbin in his review of Eclipse (Monday Book, 5 July) remarks that "the astronomy behind eclipses belongs to possibly the most boring byway in the whole of science: celestial mechanics".
As a planetary scientist who has spent his academic life studying the movements of bodies in the solar system, I believe that celestial mechanics belongs to the highway rather than the byway of science. Using celestial mechanics we can now understand why the Moon keeps the same face towards the Earth, why Jupiter's moon Io has active volcanoes and why Mercury may one day collide with Venus.
John Gribbin must have found his biographies of Newton and Einstein extremely tedious to write given these scientists' profound contributions to celestial mechanics.
CARL MURRAY
Professor of Mathematics and Astronomy
Queen Mary and Westfield College, London
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments