Letter: Case for GM trials
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I have been away from the UK and have only just received a copy of Natasha Walter's article "In the fields of conflict" (2 August). Ms Walter criticises the government-funded experiments that will study the environmental consequences of field-scale cultivation of herbicide- tolerant GM crops. She accuse them of being unscientific because they do not include baseline measurements of diversity and because the sites are open to long-range movements of organisms between the GM and control fields.
I chair the scientific steering committee that will oversee these studies. They will be carried out at a number of different paired sites, in order to make the comparisons statistically valid. The fact that we are studying differences between paired sites (GM and non-GM) makes it unnecessary to have baseline measurements of diversity, and replicate sites will, of course, be exposed to the same influences from broad-foraging organisms. Although the aim of this study is specifically to examine the influence of GM on biodiversity within current intensive farming systems, the data will be compatible with those accruing from parallel studies on diversity in other systems.
My committee, selected on the grounds of the expert knowledge of its members across the range of ecological, statistical and environmental issues relevant to the study, is independent of both the sponsoring departments and the contractors. We deplore the attempts to prevent the study from going ahead by damaging experimental sites.
The essence of the studies, which encompass three cropping systems (spring- and winter-sown oilseed rape and forage maize) is to measure the abundance of a range of indicator species within field-scale plots. This will permit us to compare the values between GM crops grown according to the seed producer's recommendations and non-GM varieties grown according to current farming practice. The publication of the results will be a useful contribution to the debate about the role of GM crops in UK agriculture.
Professor CHRIS POLLOCK
Chair, GM Crop Farm-Scale Evaluation Steering Committee
Aberystwyth, Ceredigion
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments