Letter: Cancer screening
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: Cancer screening
Sir: I should like to point out that a research paper from Copenhagen, in The Lancet (5 January, 1985) showed that women aged 40 who had not had measles as children had six times the incidence of cervical cancer when compared with a similar group of women who had had full-blown measles as children.
This research points to the suspicion that immunising children against measles may lead to a large increase in the incidence of cervical cancer in the decades to come (and other serious and chronic illnesses referred to in the same paper), which will make any problems with the cervical cancer screening programme very minor in comparison. Unfortunately, the possible long-term effects on health - of this and other childhood immunisations - just have not been researched properly, no long-term tests having been carried out on any of them!
DR ROBERT BLOMFIELD
Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments