Letter: Bright spell
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Oxford University Press survey finding that 86 per cent of people are unable to spell "millennium" is not altogether surprising (report, 12 November). Such misspelling behaviour is in the great tradition of simplified spelling.
This is at least as old as the 13th century, when a monk named Orm pushed for doubling the consonants after short vowels. "Par" would be spelled "parr". But nobody paid much attention.
Later, John Milton spelled "sovereign" as "sovran" and "their" as "thir". In the 19th century, Noah Webster, the American lexicographer, proposed to omit silent letters, spelling "head", for instance, "hed". He was successful in striking the "k" from "frolick" and "physick", but could not get the public to accept "wimmin" for "women".
At one time or another advocates of spelling reform have pushed for such words as filosofy, fonetic, alrite, thanx, lether, twelf, troble and pedagog.
JOHN O'BYRNE
Dublin
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments