Letter: Bright children
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article sneering at plans to offer bright children extra tuition in state schools on the basis that it will not tempt Mr and Mrs Range Rover into the state system is really quite astounding (22 March). Is The Independent's readership now presumed only to include people whose children are at private school?
Many bright children, especially in London, who a generation ago would have gone to grammar school are now unable to do so because of the ridiculously high level of competition (over 1,000 applicants for 93 places locally). Private schooling, especially for larger families, is simply not an option.
Government plans therefore offer a glimmer of hope for many who feel their children have been unjustly relegated to the second division. While this sentiment is unfair to many comprehensive schools it is obvious from your letters page that Seventies dogma is still alive and kicking.
Surely the aim of any good school is to develop the full potential of any child, able or otherwise, and not to maintain an egalitarian utopia. Why is there such hostility to the idea, in some quarters, that some children are brighter than others? Why is it that helping the less able is to be encouraged, while stretching bright children further is "arbitrary and divisive" to quote from one of your more depressing correspondents.
Far from being a "gimmick", the Government's plans are a creative way to increase opportunities for a greater number of children, regardless of background. How can that be a bad thing? And whilst it may well not tempt Mr and Mrs Range Rover, it may well make a difference for a great many families who, far from being converted to comprehensive education, are stuck with it.
A SIMMONDS
London N12
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments