LETTER: Blinded by science

Christopher Hill
Wednesday 05 August 1998 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Once again we have a distinguished scientist promoting science as a Good Thing (John Gribbin, "Why bother with science?", 29 July) as though the best path to honesty, integrity and morality lies in the methodology of science. If we use the words "science" and "scientist" in the same ill-defined, generalised way as he and other commentators do, we can quite forcefully say that science usually leads to technocratic arrogance. Scientists can be as venal as any other professional for they will go where the big money is. Science is increasingly commercialised and likely to be less open.

We have been brainwashed into thinking that science produces nice clear- cut answers, which of course it does within a certain domain of study. In the real, messy world of human affairs, hardly anything is clear-cut. It does not need the "honesty, integrity and morality" of science to see through meretricious advertising or political double-speak. Think of any recent controversy and you'll find one lot of scientists promoting a certain course of action with an equally qualified lot against it. What can even the moderately qualified layman make of it all? Science is synonymous with its applications: one technical fix produces unforeseen side-effects which in turn need another technical fix, and so it goes on. Let us have a more balanced debate and less of the unwarranted triumphalism surrounding science and its achievements.

CHRISTOPHER HILL

Stockbridge, Hampshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in