Letter: Beef and science
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The French Minister of Agriculture is able to refer to the weight of scientific evidence emanating from the newly formed French food safety agency, which, on 1 October, presented its unfavourable report on British beef.
The EU scientific committee later confirmed their confidence in the measures adopted to enable British beef to regain its European markets. The French food standards agency then, predictably, questioned the scientific competence of the EU committee to judge on the matter. This situation, from a UK standpoint, has been overseen by our Minister of Agriculture.
The UK has only itself to blame. What has become of the Food Standards Agency, still to get off the ground years after it was first proposed? Had that been up and running it would now be at the sharp end, sorting out these scientific quibbles with the French food safety agency.
When will the Ministry of Agriculture be forced to give up its dual wartime role of trying to represent both producers and consumers? Is it necessary any longer for the farming industry to have Cabinet representation?
It is time for a Ministry of Rural Development to represent all rural interests, including agriculture, and an independent Food Standards Agency able to represent the consumer's interests in safety, healthy eating, confidence and value for money. There should be monitoring of supermarkets to ensure that the customer benefits from competition, but not at the expense of UK producers.
Rather than arguing whether or not UK beef is safe to eat on the bone, or off, let's get UK beef prices down and on to the plate of those who have every confidence eating it. There would then be not enough to sell to France, but we might still put some prime beef aside, for our special customers.
MICHAEL BOWEN
Bradford-on-Avon, Wiltshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments