Letter: Barbaric drug tests
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter:
Barbaric drug tests
Sir: The claim of some pharmaceutical companies that no harm will come to those who volunteer to test their products is self-evident nonsense ("Anyone for pesticide", 29 July). If they knew that, they would not need to test the product.
The use of human guinea pigs recruited from the most insecure sections of society (witness the adverts in The Big Issue) is a barbaric practice. It is no answer for the companies concerned to say that the transaction is voluntary. If a relationship is exploitative, getting the weaker party to consent through a bribe does not make everything all right. It would be no answer to a charge of paedophilia for the participants to explain their relationship was consensual.
Dr GARY SLAPPER
The Law Programme
The Open University
Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments