Letter: Avant garde

Philip Freeman
Tuesday 16 March 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: While I read with great interest the piece by Philip Hensher "If this is great art, how can it be reduced to a joke?" (11 March) I cannot help feeling he has got matters back to front.

Writing about the work of the conceptual artist Gillian Wearing, and the tendency for her ideas to be heavily borrowed by the advertising industry, he seemed to feel that the solution is for her art to become more complex, and thus less easily borrowed.

Having your ideas borrowed is the whole point. The artist's function within society is surely to act as an agent for cultural reconnaissance, to look at avenues we might wish to wander down.

The only dilemma comes when the plagiarism affects your ability to command a market price. That difficulty is caused by treating art as commodity. But it isn't the fault of the art itself.

The commercial rot in the art world has gone too far for us to stop it (it is, after all, nearly as old as art itself), and the only correction left is by way of public money being given to artists. Which is presumably why we have national collections.

The logical conclusion to this economic quadrille is to tax the advertising industry itself; a tariff could be set up for how often they raided the ideas from our cultural storehouse.

PHILIP FREEMAN

Llandinam, Powys

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in