Letter: Austere medicine
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your article "In defence of IMF austerity" (Business Outlook, 29 October) does not take account of the failure of previous IMF austerity packages in tackling financial crisis, or their impact in terms of deepening poverty in countries where they are applied.
IMF austerity packages for East Asia failed to stem the region's financial crisis. However, they did give rise to full-blown recession with appalling consequences for the poor and vulnerable: in Indonesia alone 100 million people will be living in poverty by the end of the year - a fourfold increase over 1996. In Brazil, the IMF is in danger of repeating the same policy mistakes it made in East Asia.
The article suggests that Brazil is showing "courage" in implementing austerity measures "being pushed through at great ... social cost". But it is likely that the poor will end up paying disproportionately for financial stability through further cuts in social spending. Basic health care and education are already in a parlous state and Brazil's 50 million poor cannot afford further declines in quality and access to these services. Fiscal and trade deficits have to be reduced but this should be through reallocated and progressive taxation.
Throughout the global financial crisis it is the poor who have paid the heaviest price for the consequences of under-regulated capital markets. National and international action is needed now to create a regulatory framework for a more stable and efficient market. This would involve the development of effective controls on capital movements, such as Chile's tax on short-term capital investments; action to reduce the incentives for high-risk capital flows, such as an end to bail-outs; and improved transparency and accountability of banks.
STEWART WALLIS
International Director, Oxfam GB
Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments