Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Presumably those backers of Hamilton would have been happy enough to get their money back from the damages and costs Fayed would have had to pay if he had lost the libel action ("Earl known as `Q' is refusing to pay Fayed", 24 December). It is right and proper that they should pay the bill now.
I find the attempt to portray Hamilton as some sort of martyr sickening. One wonders if the real reason Hamilton was backed by some of his supporters was to get at Fayed, who had ruffled too many Establishment figures and who in his scattergun approach to matters concerning arms dealing and the death of Diana may be keeping open what some would wish to be buried.
Whether Fayed's conclusions are the correct ones or not, many questions on these matters have not been satisfactorily answered. I hope he continues to raise them.
D NIXON
Albrighton,
Shropshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments