Letter: Animal testing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: C Ray Greek misrepresents the history of the thalidomide disaster.
Thalidomide was not tested on pregnant animals before being used in patients. Within six months of the publication of the first clinical report linking phocomelia in babies with maternal ingestion of thalidomide during pregnancy, this exact phenomenon was reported in experimental studies in rabbits.
If thalidomide was produced as a potential therapy today it would not get through preliminary animal tests now required. The thalidomide story, far from casting doubt on the reliability of animal testing, is an endorsement of it.
Dr JACK BOTTING
London SW16
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments