Letter: Affairs of honour

David C. Bate Qc
Saturday 02 January 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

LETTERS:

Affairs of honour

Sir: A friend of mine, Mrs Phyl McMillan, was included in the New Year Honours as an MBE, having dedicated almost 50 years of her life to the unpaid teaching of disabled swimmers.

When nominating her, I resisted the temptation to suggest a peerage, or a knighthood, rather than a less prestigious honour, because I thought it would be considered inappropriate. I now wonder if I was right. At a time of debate as to how best to modernise the House of Lords, am I alone in questioning the criteria by which honours are awarded?

By way of example only, have not the acting of Sir Nigel Hawthorne and the boxing of Prince Naseem Hamed MBE already been properly recognised by the fame and fortune each has so deservedly achieved?

As the millennium approaches, should a number of honours still be reserved for those who are in paid employment in the civil and diplomatic services and the armed forces?

At least as regards the CBE, OBE and MBE, would it not be preferable if they were awarded for unpaid service to the community and all recipients (rather than simply a majority as at present) had to be nominated by members of the public?

DAVID C BATE QC

London EC4

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in