Letter: A vote for Dyke
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your editorial states that the central challenge facing the BBC is the "need to balance quality broadcasting with the mass audiences required to justify the licence fee".
Why subject the BBC to this nexus? The BBC is a national cultural asset, just like the Tate Gallery. Would you require the Tate to attract mass audiences for every exhibition in order to justify financial support from the state?
The Government should pledge to the BBC the right level of licence fee (which should be settled after full public consultation on what the BBC should be doing with the public's money in terms of channels, radio stations, websites etc) and allow it to get on with a settled public service remit, to create a point of difference from the commercial broadcasters.
MARK AMBROSE
London W5
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments