Letter: A price-tag on truth

Mike Jempson
Sunday 21 June 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A price-tag on truth

Sir: Max Clifford is right to warn those who sell their stories that their reputations will for ever be at risk. ("Even a child killer should be able to sell her story", 18 June) He is wrong to suggest the market place is the best regulator of press morals.

The newspaper business is about making money and a chequebook has no morals. If newspapers see it as their function to hand out rough justice every day, they must be prepared to take it. But they have decreed that the Press Complaints Commission they pay to regulate the industry cannot levy a tax on profits when a newspaper breaches the ethical code drawn up by the industry.

Until such breaches come with a price-tag the marketplace will remain littered with people whose lives have been damaged by the cavalier attitude of the press to human tragedy. Our clients are those who fall foul of the media. They can testify to the lasting harm caused when papers turn with spiteful glee on those who take cheques from their rivals.

Buying exclusive rights is the antithesis of press freedom. Suggest that the practice be outlawed and the industry invokes the spirit of Wilkes. The same cry goes up if anyone has the temerity to say that the innocent victims of their circulation wars should be compensated.

If information is in the public interest it should not have a price-tag - and it should be the press who are reminding us, not Louise Woodward.

MIKE JEMPSON

Executive Director

PressWise

Bristol

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in