Letter: A lesson for schools
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The latest grammar school debate ("Third of grammars under threat", 1 September) involves the usual thinly disguised mish-mash of social resentments which surface whenever selective and private education is discussed, but it reminded me that there are sensible alternatives which we scarcely consider.
Far-from-wealthy friends in in the Australian state of Victoria are able to send their children to a private school (Steiner, as it happens) because their fees are subsidised. The state government reasons that it is cheaper to pay part of the costs of educating a child privately than to bear the whole cost of keeping that child in the state system.
Everyone benefits; the state's education budget goes further, and it means private schooling is an affordable option for many more people.
I imagine that such a solution is far too reasonable for our hide-bound political system, but it seems to make perfect sense.
GEORGE BENNETT
London N19
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments