Letter: A British senate
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The current debate on House of Lords reform is dealing with only half the story. The upper chamber is still being portrayed simply as a scrutinising and blocking legislature. But in mature democracies like the United States and Australia, the Senate has a valuable second role. It protects the smaller states from domination by the larger.
Rhode Island sends two senators to Washington; so does California. Tasmania sends ten senators to Canberra; so does New South Wales. The small states are given equal power to block and harry legislation.
A reformed House of Lords might consist of 25 representatives each from England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, putting a brake on domination by South-east England.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments