Leading article: Yielding to temptation

Thursday 18 November 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"LEAD US not into temptation..." How often we have heard those words, embedded as they are in the Lord's Prayer, which the Gospels tell us Jesus taught to his disciples. Whether or not we are religious, the words wash over and around us, their rotund syllables sounding like the tolling of bells, and about as meaningful. But ever since early Protestants such as William Tyndale began to translate the Bible from Latin into the vernacular, people have demanded to know just what these words mean. After all, you can hardly translate something without thinking first what it's about.

For those who prefer the aesthetics of religion to its claims to be in touch with a supernatural reality, the King James version, of 1611, solves the problem neatly. The vocabulary of Tudor England is now so dated that much of it works like Church Latin, in which unknown words hallowed by age allow sanctity comfortably to oust comprehension. But reformers never rest, and today's literal-minded translators have returned to the Synod of the Church of England, determined to let daylight in on magic. If they were to have their way, out would go "temptation", for example, and in would come "time of trial".

To our unbelieving mind, there's not a lot of difference here. The important thing surely is what temptation might be dangled before us, or what trial we could be asked to undergo. Jesus, readers of the Bible will recall, was himself tempted by the Devil, during his 40 days and 40 nights in the desert, with "all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them". For many of us, though, it's more likely to be that extra digestive biscuit (and we say, go on, take it, you only live once).

As to power and glory, since this is an age in which people are more likely to pray for their chance to obtain those twin desiderata than to avoid them, it hardly matters how the Synod chooses to render the ancient words of the New Testament.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in