Leading article: Time to stand in the path of the juggernaut
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IT IS instructive to define a government by its enemies: Margaret Thatcher brought the ban-the-bombers and trade unionists on to the streets to protest, and stimulated the poor and disadvantaged to riot. So far the Labour Government has induced the Barbour-clad countryside to march on London, and the lorry-drivers to block Park Lane. Today, the lorries are coming again, aiming to jam the centres of six cities. In London, they are expected to be joined by taxi-drivers and pig-farmers. This unlikely coalition is no more likely than the miners and the disaffected youth of Brixton to bring the Government to its knees.
Some of the reversals of left and right since the Eighties are none the less piquant. To have The Daily Telegraph defend unlawful disruption by truckers brings back memories of left-wing commentators wringing their hands over picket-line violence. The Telegraph described the lorry-drivers' action as "desperate" but "understandable", and said expressions of "public tolerance, bordering on goodwill" should be a warning to the Government.
Any fair-minded observer should, however, condemn even-handedly any antisocial attempt by sectional interests to change Government policy in their favour. Especially in this case, when the broader public interest is clear. Gordon Brown was quite right in his Budget to continue the Conservative policy of annual real increases in petrol and diesel duty. (The notion that diesel was a "greener" fuel because it produces less greenhouse gas has been overthrown by the more direct threat to human health of particulates.) Congestion will do the job of limiting traffic growth - but it is more economically efficient to use prices to achieve the same end. While the sharp shift in road duty to discourage bridge-shaking, building-juddering, five-axle lorries in favour of smoother six-axle ones was overdue.
The truckers' main argument - apart from self-interest - is that the Budget tax increases are self-defeating, because haulage companies will run their juggernauts under "plates of convenience" from Luxemburg or Bulgaria. Norbert Dentressangle, the king of the big beasts of the road, has already announced 30 redundancies as he concentrates resources in the French part of his operation.
This is less of problem than the haulage industry pretends, though, because other corporate taxes are higher on the Continent. But the Government finds it difficult to counter this argument because the right response is to support some degree of tax harmonisation across Europe.
It should be said that the solution is not to get into a low-tax auction, with each country underbidding its neighbours. Britain should not lower its taxes on road transport, but seek to persuade its partners to raise theirs. It is the right way to preserve the environment and encourage rail freight. The Government must stand firm against the extra-parliamentary tactics of the New Scargillites.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments