Leading article: Time to banish drugs from sport

Thursday 20 August 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ANYONE THINKING that the days of hearing commentators praise "powerful" female East German shot-putters and "muscular" Bulgarian pentathletes had passed will be disappointed. The farce of the Tour de France was a warning. Now the Australian delegation to an emergency meeting of the International Olympic Committee, fearing scandal at the Sydney Games in 2000, have recommended excluding certain sports, within which drug-taking seems endemic, from the games. This comes only weeks after the IOC president, Juan Antonio Samaranch, announced himself to be in favour of some relaxation of the rules.

Certain sports, such as cycling and swimming, are riddled with drugs. In others, such as athletics, drug-taking is more widespread than the numbers caught would lead us to suppose. Certain nations also stand accused, as the IOC medical commission chairman's attack on Spain reveals.

Samaranch's controversial argument is that some drugs, especially medicines containing small amounts of banned substances, are simply another way of enhancing performance. Athletes adopt better training shoes and better diet, so why not better drugs? But the use of external aids is not the same as changing the performance of the body itself, since Olympic glory is, essentially, the struggle to better that body. Taking drugs is cheating, since it gives that athlete an advantage over others. Who wants to see athletes from rich countries, junked up on steroids, outperform those from smaller nations who cannot afford them?

The Australians have their own problems; one of their athletes tested positive for drugs on Wednesday. But their proposals, for the IOC's February summit, are the best on the table; they include imposing fines on athletes, further integration of different federations' rules, a specialist IOC drugs agency and increased powers for police forces. Such ideas were discussed before the Atlanta games, and rejected. This time, there must be no backsliding.

out that, in this respect too, men and women are more equal than previously suspected. Shurely cause for shelebration, shishters?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in