Leading Article: The crucial next stage of European integration

Wednesday 03 February 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IN PLEDGING ground troops to any Kosovo peace agreement, Britain and France are trying to send a tough message to Belgrade. At the same time, they are now presented with a precious opportunity. The embryonic "European defence identity" desperately needs added political commitment and military muscle; warning that European troops will be sent, without depending on the Americans to act first, is a sign that it is acquiring them.

This Government has made much of its commitment to such an identity. As Doug Henderson, the Armed Forces Minister, argued on Monday, a European leg of Nato should be able to act with "authority and decisiveness". The St Malo pact of last December, in which the French and British agreed to unprecedented levels of military co-operation, and that such issues could be brought before the EU Council of Ministers, proved to be one of the few high points of the Prime Minister's much-expressed wish to "lead in Europe".

The merger boom in European defence industries is another reason why such a defence union is desirable. A single European defence arm could order weapons on the scale of the US armed forces, matching their scale and scope. The Government has already been promoting such endeavours, which is why the Prime Minister was embarrassed that British Aerospace has chosen to merge with GEC, rather than with the German company Dasa.

Europeans should be able to manage their own affairs, rather than look to the Americans to intervene. It is hard enough to persuade Britons that their forces should fight for small states in the Balkans. Why then should boys from Kansas or Indiana feel that their vital interests are at stake?

This need not cause friction with the Americans, or threaten the future of Nato. A vigorous European assertion of military independence may be welcome in Washington, as shoring up the Nato structure. Better to deal with one confident voice, rather than a discordant ensemble. Successive residents of the White House have, since the Sixties, yearned after a reliable and strong European ally that took off them some of the weight of being world policeman; now such a partner could be in sight.

The British and French made themselves look foolish in Bosnia, using the refusal of the US to commit ground troops before a peace agreement had been reached, to limit their own efforts to supplying food to the victims. Many innocent people had to die before the excuse withered as the Americans joined in air strikes. It is to be hoped that Robin Cook's strong words mean such a tragedy will not be repeated. But it is also possible that operations undertaken in the name of Europe will allow more decisive and immediate action, and herald a crucial new stage of European integration.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in