Leading Article: Nanny judges, beware
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WHEN A court usurps the role of parents and presumes to know what is in the best interests of a child, it should make us queasy. The father and HIV-positive mother who were ordered yesterday by a judge to submit their baby to an HIV test are devoted to their daughter. There is no reason to suppose that they would do anything but their best for her.
Social workers should intervene only where the evidence of potential harm is overwhelming. The risk to the child in this case from the mother's sincere, but misguided, belief that HIV does not cause Aids tips the balance in favour of intervention - but only just. It must not, however, be a precedent or a charter for intervention.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments