Leading Article: After war war, let's try jaw jaw

Wednesday 28 October 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE COMMENT by the Foreign Secretary that "there is going to be no discussion, negotiations or debate" about the sovereignty of the Falklands during President Menem's visit was, of course, inevitable. No ambitious politician can afford to take the "unpatriotic" tack and look "soft" on the Falklands. Downing Street's botched attempt to smooth over the issue by planting an "apology" in The Sun that wasn't by Menem, and embarrassment over the arrest of General Pinochet, demonstrate the hazards. Our folk memory of the conflict of 16 years ago remains painful.

But this is a pity, not least for the islanders themselves. There are practical questions about the long-term future of the Falklands, for example on oil exploration and economic development. The question of political status overshadows these and creates a climate of uncertainty.

Argentina, it must be said, has a perfectly legitimate right to pursue its claim on sovereignty for the islands by diplomatic and political routes. No one can seriously object to a British dialogue with Argentina in which both nations honourably present their case and recognise their differences. It may be, initially, a seemingly futile dialogue, a conversation of the deaf. But it is still far preferable to the alternative and, one day, may even lead to the kind of imaginative, bold initiatives that have been seen, in different circumstances, in Northern Ireland, the Middle East and South Africa.

The islanders' wishes remain the ultimate deciding factor. There is no question of simply giving up the Falklands. What is important is, as the Foreign Secretary says, "how we achieve a mature, strong, healthy relationship between two democracies". Central to that relationship has to be, in the long term, some agreement on the Falklands. It cannot be ignored or wished away.

It will do us - and the Falkland Islanders - no harm to recognise that the best possible solution would be a negotiated settlement between all interested parties, sharing sovereignty and/or resources. It may sound far-fetched, but the spirit of the South Atlantic has achieved the near- impossible before.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in