Ivory Towers: Chunks, not pieces, of eight
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ALEX has been the subject of numerous studies, writes William Hartston. His communicating, conceptual, cognitive and problem-solving abilities have all been the subject of academic papers. Alex is a parrot and his current interest, as reported in 'Numerical Competence in an African Gray Parrot (Psittacus erithacus)' by Irene M Pepperberg (Comparative Psychology, 1994, No 1), is counting.
Research on humans and animals has identified two processes of enumeration: 'Subitizing' is fast and effortless, applies to collections of no more than eight objects and consists of an immediate perception of how many items are present. 'Counting' is the tedious 1,2,3 process.
What looks like counting, however, may be achieved by 'chunking', whereby a group of six is subitized as two chunks of three.
To prevent Alex's adoption of such non-counting strategies, he was tested with groups of items varying in form and colour. From a batch of blue and red keys and trucks, he was asked: 'How many blue keys?'
Under such conditions, it has been shown that humans count rather than subitize. Alex's score of 83.3 per cent accuracy suggests that he may be able to count too, but the researcher concludes: 'Determining whether Alex can count in the human sense, however, may not be especially useful.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments