Independent Pursuits: Bridge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NOT MANY bridge articles deal with the common enough problem of minimising a certain loss, but this deal - from some 40 years ago - comes to mind.
West opened One Spade, East responded Two Clubs and (as South) I joined in with Two Hearts. West doubled and all passed.
You can tell that this was an ancient hand - nowadays it is doubtful whether East would have bid at the Two level and, most certainly, West's double would have meant something quite different.
West led 210 against Two Hearts doubled and East won dummy's jack with his queen. He would have done better to play a spade now, but he was concerned with the possibility that 210 was a singleton and therefore he cashed a second club before doing so.
I ruffed the third round of spades and followed with !K. This seemed natural enough, but West held off. Now he was able to play a forcing game with his spades and, whatever I tried, ended with three trump tricks to score 500 points. I was happy enough to note that East-West could have made game in spades but, on reflection, I might have done even better.
Suppose that, instead of leading !K, I had crossed to dummy with #K and finessed !10? Not with any hope of its winning, you understand, but dummy's second trump would have protected me against a force. In this way the loss would have been only 200 points.
Game all; dealer West
North
410 8 7
!3 2
#K 7 4 2
2J 9 8 2
West East
4A K J 9 5 44 3 2
!A J 8 4 !5
#J 9 #10 8 6 3
210 3 2A K Q 7 5
South
4Q 6
!K Q 10 9 7 6
#A Q 5
26 4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments