Independent Pursuits: Bridge

Alan Hiron
Monday 21 December 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

South made a good start in his game contract on this deal and, indeed, achieved a winning end position. However, West found a deceptive defence and - now faced with a guess - declarer got it wrong.

South opened One Heart and, after a pass by West, North raised directly to game to end the auction. West led #Q against Four Hearts and it was immediately clear to declarer that the complete duplication of the North- South distribution would set problems. East overtook his partner's #Q, hoping to be left on lead to push a spade through, but South won, drew trumps in two rounds, cashed 2AK, and exited with #10.

West won with his jack and continued with 2J. East studies this for some while for, superficially at any rate, it looked best to overtake in order to lead a spade. But would that help? Certainly not as the cards lie, for South would play low and West would be end-played. Even if West's spades were as good as A Q x, there was no hurry, for West could get off lead safely with a low spade.

Eventually East allowed his partner to hold the club trick (Lunatic or genius? As SJ Simon once wrote). It looked fatal for the defence but West found the inspired exit of 410! Now, from declarer's point of view, this was just the card that he would have led from 4Q10 8 x (x) or 4K10 8 x (x). Hoping that the lead was from a five-card suit (when East would therefore have 4K x or 4Q x), declarer played low from dummy and, after winning with his ace, got off lead with spade. Oh dear! East was not end-played at all, and West triumphantly took the next two tricks with 4Q and 4K...

East-West game; dealer South

North

4J 7 4

!Q J 8 5 4

#10 7

2A K 8

West East

4K Q 10 8 46 5 2

!10 !9 6

#Q J 9 8 2 #K 6 5 4

2J 10 6 2Q 9 3 2

South

4A 9 3

!A K 7 3 2

#A 3

27 5 4

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in