HOME THOUGHTS
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
LIKE ME, you might have read the findings of a study published this week which showed that women employed by television companies work such hellishly long hours that they are too busy to have children; or if they do have families, they spend very little time with them. I'm sure that it is not just women who work in television who face these problems: I know plenty of mothers - journalists, advertising executives, computer programmers - who have given up work because it proved impossible to combine a career with seeing their small children. And I know others who have continued to work long hours, and are constantly exhausted and racked with guilt.
I'm beginning to think that we've all been conned: these days you're supposed to be able to have a great career at the same time as being a good mother and a cheerfully beaming wife. Maybe there are a few superwomen out there who can manage the juggling act, but I can't. The problem is that it is not until you actually have a baby that you realise what you've let yourself in for. I was 27 when I was pregnant with my first child, and I had no idea how my life would change: I was working long hours, five days a week for the Independent, and I imagined that when the baby was born, I'd be back at my desk in a couple of months. I seem to remember thinking that babies were a bit like kittens: you'd feed them some milk occasionally, stroke them and then they'd fall asleep.
It was a terrible shock to have a real live baby who had needs more enormous than I'd ever contemplated. I went back to work when he was 14 weeks old, because my maternity leave had run out and there seemed to be no alternative. We needed the money to pay a mortgage that was based on two wage-earners, and anyway, would I be a real person if I didn't work?
But I hated leaving him, and he hated being left. I spent the first week at work feeling tearful, and expressing milk down the lavatory; then my extremely kind boss - a man, to whom I will be forever grateful - allowed me to work three days a week. When Jamie was three I started working four days a week, and after my second child was born earlier this year, I thought I'd be able to carry on in this way. But just as you forget the pain of childbirth, you also forget how hard it is to leave a small baby. I could just about manage to do my job when I returned in September, but as soon as there were a few complications - a nanny with flu; family problems; my husband working in America for two months - everything started to fall apart. (And as for "quality time" at the end of a working day when the kids were tired and so was I - forget it.) So, for the time being, I'm only working two mornings a week, and that's at home. Life is suddenly much more calm, for all of us.
When I was a child, none of my friends had mothers who worked. Mine did, but she was a teacher, and usually home by 4pm. Were we happier than if we'd been brought up by a series of nannies and childminders? I don't know. What I do know is that I'd be miserable if I never had a job again. Still, I keep reminding myself that babies become children very fast: and I'm seeing this one grow up, for a little while at least. Sometimes you just can't have it all. !
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments