HEALTH / Common Procedures: Blood transfusions

Dr Tony Smith
Saturday 22 August 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SOMEONE who has lost a lot of blood in an accident or from internal bleeding from the stomach or intestines will recover most quickly and surely if the amount of blood lost is put back into a vein - a blood transfusion.

Attempts at blood transfusion in the 19th century were mostly disastrous. When blood from animals and most human blood was put into the circulation, it provoked acute illness which often led to fatal kidney failure. Sometimes, however, human blood did not cause a reaction, and at the beginning of the 20th century the Austrian pathologist Karl Landsteiner showed that human blood could be divided into four main types - A, B, AB, and O. If someone is given blood of their own type the chances of a reaction are much reduced. The remaining risk can be virtually eliminated by mixing together in the laboratory samples of blood from the donor and the recipient, a test known as cross matching.

Once these principles were established, blood transfusion became an essential part of medicine. In the 1920s and 1930s it helped remove the main risk of death in childbirth and it remains the first step in the resuscitation of victims of road accidents and war injuries. Much complex surgery, such as coronary artery bypass operations and joint replacements, relies on blood transfusion. Repeated transfusions are needed to maintain the health of people with chronic disorders such as thalassaemia.

Despite research, no satisfactory substitute has been found for human blood, and around the world blood is collected from donors and stored in banks. Some countries follow the British example of relying on volunteer donors, while in others donors are paid. The science of blood transfusion has advanced a great deal since Landsteiner's time; 21 blood group systems are now recognised, and though groups such as the Lewis and MNS systems are not usually of practical significance they sometimes cause problems in patients who need repeated transfusions. The main problem for blood transfusion services, however, is infection.

A blood donor may feel healthy but his or her blood may contain malaria parasites, syphilis bacteria, one or more of the viruses causing hepatitis, or the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the cause of Aids. Health screening of donors, and tests on donated blood can reduce the risks of these infections being transmitted to very low levels, but cannot eliminate them. With HIV there is a period of several weeks between infection and the antibody test becoming positive, and if blood is given during this period it may contain the virus. The estimate for the risk of a blood transfusion transmitting HIV is one in a million in Britain but about one in 60,000 in the United States.

So long as these risks continue, surgeons will be looking for ways of reducing the need to transfuse donated blood. Two methods have been found. Patients on a waiting list for surgery can donate several pints of their own blood in the weeks before the operation, and this can be stored until needed. During surgery blood can be salvaged from the operation site, cleaned, and returned to the patient. Giving blood is altruistic; it has no drawbacks or risks; and anyone who has not come forward as a donor should ask themselves why not.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in