Games: Bridge

Alan Hiron
Tuesday 17 August 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

HAVING BEEN eliminated early in a knockout team event, I found myself watching our conquerors in the next round and wishing they had performed in the same fashion against us. I thought they had bid this deal efficiently, exploring slam chances below the game level. But oh dear! the play . . .

South opened One Spade and North responded Two No-trumps. This agreed spades as trumps, was forcing to game, and invited his partner to show any shortage. A response of Three Diamonds would have been music to North's ears, guaranteeing an excellent fit. South, however, with no shortages, rebid Three Spades - still expressing mild forward-going interest. North cue-bid Four Clubs, South replied in kind with Four Diamonds and, feeling that he had done enough, North signed off with Four Spades to end the auction.

West led 210 against Four Spades and, after drawing trumps in two rounds, declarer tried a heart to the king. This lost to the ace, a diamond came back and, no matter what South tried, there were now four losers in the red suits and the contract failed.

Well, his line of play had given declarer an excellent chance; he had been unlucky to fail. But I felt he might have done even better. After drawing trumps, suppose he leads a low heart from dummy towards his jack? As the cards lie, I expect East to win and return a diamond. South plays low but can now establish a heart trick for a diamond discard. And if !J loses to West's queen? There is still time to try a heart towards the king with a possible diamond finesse in reserve.

Game all; dealer South

North

4K Q 8 2

!K 6 3

#10 5 2

2A Q 7

West East

47 3 410 5

!10 8 7 5 !A Q 9 4

#K J 8 #9 7 6 3

210 9 8 3 2J 5 4

South

4A J 9 6 4

!J 2

#A Q 4

2K 6 2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in