Tim's Vermeer: Film review - eccentric experiment throws new light on a great master
(12A) Teller, 80 mins
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In this intriguing and provocative documentary, a Texas-based inventor paints a version of Vermeer's The Music Lesson in a warehouse in Texas.
At first, Tim Jenison's attitude toward the 17th century Dutch painter seems hostile and reductive. He's a self-confessed "geek", a scientist who was heavily involved in the desktop video revolution. Jenison's goal is to prove that Vermeer used lenses and mirrors and that his technique was essentially "photographic". In other words, Vermeer's work was more to do with reproduction than original artistic inspiration – anyone with his tools could achieve the same effect of extreme verisimilitude and create the illusion of "painting with light".
The director is Jenison's close friend Teller, one half of the magic duo Penn & Teller. This itself causes suspicion. Surely, audiences may think, the film itself is an exercise in legerdemain. As it turns out, Teller's approach is as painstaking as that of Jenison, who ends up spending several years on his Quixotic experiment.
Jenison is clearly extremely rich. That means he has the time to go to Delft to study the light and architecture. He is also a brilliant and dedicated scientist. His fascination with Vermeer was sparked when his daughter gave him a book on the artist by David Hockney (who features prominently in the documentary).
Ironically, the longer Jenison spends on trying to paint like a Dutch master , the more mysterious Vermeer's genius seems. This is not a case of a master forger dashing off a quick copy. Jenison's experiment is an act of homage, not one of debunking. He gives us greater insight into the methods of the artist than we are ever likely to receive from a conventional art historian.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments