Sleuth (15)
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Strewth, more like. This is Jude Law's second attempt to reprise a role first played by Michael Caine. Three years ago he starred in a pathetic remake of Alfie, now he's doing a variation on a character Caine played in the 1972 thriller Sleuth. What next – Blame it on Rio? The Muppet Christmas Carol?
Caine himself now plays opposite Law in the part Laurence Olivier took, thus creating an old stager-young pretender frisson between them. Well, that's the idea. Whatever cross-currents of tension and loathing Anthony Shaffer's original award-winning play conjured have been utterly dissipated by Kenneth Branagh's painfully stagey direction and Harold Pinter's script, whose evocation of menace is so poorly managed it feels like self-parody. Tim Harvey's minimalist production design only throws the stiltedness into sharper relief. As for the two leads, take your pick: Caine is unconvincing, Law is strictly unwatchable.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments