The Interview, film review: Misconceived, tasteless and only very intermittently funny
(15) Evan Goldberg, Seth Rogen, 112 mins. Starring: James Franco, Seth Rogen, Lizzy Caplan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Interview had already earned its place in film history. It provoked the wrath of North Korea, precipitated a crisis at Sony (the studio that made it), stoked debates about free speech and became one of the most successful digital releases of all time after several US cinema chains refused to show it.
The film itself is strangely misconceived, tasteless and only very intermittently funny. Its main quality is chutzpah – it was a bold and probably rash idea for Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg to make a film about a US chat-show host trying to assassinate the North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.
James Franco is good value in a Jerry Lewis-like way as the engaging but superficial and sleazy Dave Skylark, host of Skylark Tonight, where he interviews celebrities such as Eminem or Rob Lowe about sexuality or hair loss.
Rogen plays his producer Aaron Rapaport, a doughty but frustrated would-be Ed Murrow-type who sees the interview with the North Korea leader as a way of proving his journalistic credentials.
Any political insights here are embarrassingly shallow. The frat-boy-style humour sits uncomfortably alongside references to torture and starvation.
The film is also disconcertingly violent for a would-be comedy: characters have fingers bitten off and helicopters are blasted out of the sky. In hindsight, it seems bizarre that a film so messy and mediocre has caused such huge reverberations.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments