Ford v Ferrari first-look review, Toronto Film Festival: Undercooked and unconvincing – but a must for petrolheads

Director James Mangold manages to keep things exciting, even for those with no interest in racing cars

Kambole Campbell
Tuesday 10 September 2019 16:48 BST
Comments
Ford vs Ferrari (Le Mans '66) Trailer

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Dir: James Mangold. Starring: Matt Damon, Christian Bale, Jon Bernthal, Caitriona Balfe, Tracy Letts. PG, 152 mins

From the macho posturing and talk of warfare to the various kiss-off lines about engine speed, James Mangold’s Ford v Ferrari (aka Le Mans 66) feels as though it runs on testosterone as much as it does gasoline. The film follows the partnership between car designer Carroll Shelby (Matt Damon) and the very appropriately named racer Ken Miles (Christian Bale) as they build the famous Ford GT40, the only American automobile to date to win Le Mans. While the film reaches moments of genuine thrills in its depiction of the perilous car testing on the way to even more perilous races, Ford v Ferrari has a long running time, but still somehow feels undercooked.

Bale has strong chemistry with Damon, but, outside of their relationship and their various arguments with the “suits”, the writing is unconvincing – indeed, the bulk of the characters feel like an afterthought. Perhaps the most fascinating element of Jez Butterworth and John-Henry Butterworth’s script explores the clash between creativity and corporate culture. Henry Ford II (Tracy Letts), in order to better compete with Ferrari, hires an eccentric, talented team, but then refuses to place his faith in their decisions.

The relationships between the designers and their corporate overlords at Ford could be compared to those between filmmakers and production companies, the desire to create something unique coming into conflict with a desire to sell something. To these boardroom committees, the film argues, hiring someone means owning them. If this sounds a bit dry, it helps that the racing itself is exciting: all fast, furious and full of twisted metal. Mangold does well to maintain a sense of peril as well as make the 24 Hours of Le Mans race something that’s visually compelling and exciting, even to those not enthusiastic about the sport.

It’s a film that feels as though it was developed in a lab for dads, a kind of Right Stuff for petrolheads. It takes great pleasure in detailing the process that makes incredible feats of engineering happen, as well as the danger that these creators face. It’s in these moments that the film fires on all cylinders, propelled by strong personalities and fast cars. It’s a shame that the rest feels so slight.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in