Film review: Compliance (15)

 

Anthony Quinn
Thursday 21 March 2013 19:30 GMT
Comments
True nightmare: Dreama Walker is the victim of a vicious hoax in the discomforting, then maddening 'Compliance'
True nightmare: Dreama Walker is the victim of a vicious hoax in the discomforting, then maddening 'Compliance'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Craig Zobel's drama, allegedly "inspired by true events", is a banal nightmare about coercion and gullibility.

The setting is a fast-food chicken joint in Ohio, where the manager Sandra (Ann Dowd) receives a phonecall from a police officer claiming that one of her staff, Becky (Dreama Walker), has stolen money from a customer's purse. He asks Sandra to detain and then strip-search her, drawing in other members of staff as accomplices.

The audience discovers early on that this is a hoax call, and we wait for Sandra, or Becky, or someone, to challenge him: but they never do, and the prank escalates steadily, sickeningly.

One of the creepiest aspects of it is the way the caller (played by Pat Healy) alternately coaxes and intimidates Sandra, who seems to half-enjoy this sudden inexplicable burden of responsibility. It's discomforting, and superbly acted – and also maddening.

The call, lasting for more than an hour, feels like watching a schoolboy sadist maiming a puppy. There's not enough light and shade to its portrayal of dumbstruck obedience.

The "true events" may be unimpeachable, but the film is heavy-handed and patronising in its indictment of human credulity.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in